“Watch therefore, and pray always that you may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that will come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man.”
“Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching.”
“If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee.”
“Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.”
January 9, 2011
“There is an evil which I have seen under the sun, and it is common among men: a man to whom God hath given riches, wealth, and honour, so that he wanteth nothing for his soul of all that he desireth, yet God giveth him not power to eat thereof, but a stranger eateth it: this is vanity, and it is an evil disease.” – Ecclesiastes 6:1-2
“There is a sore evil which I have seen under the sun, namely, riches kept for the owners thereof to their hurt. But those riches perish by evil travail: and he begetteth a son, and there is nothing in his hand. As he came forth of his mother’s womb, naked shall he return to go as he came, and shall take nothing of his labour, which he may carry away in his hand.” – Ecclesiastes 5:13-15
“And He began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again. And He spake that saying openly. And Peter took Him, and began to rebuke Him. But when He had turned about and looked on His disciples, He rebuked Peter, saying, ‘Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.’ And when he had called the people unto Him with His disciples also, He said unto them, ‘Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it; but whosoever shall lose his life for my sake and the gospel’s, the same shall save it. For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when He cometh in the glory of His Father with the holy angels’.” – Mark 8:31-38
“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.” – 1 John 4:1
Bill Gates and other elitists claim that their plans will reduce global poverty. And they will, but not in the way they would have you believe. The elitists plan to reduce global poverty by eliminating the poor in the world through vaccines, control of the global food supply, GMOs, control over growing your own food, control of vitamins and herbal supplements, control of clean water, control of health care, and control of cheap forms of energy. If you think this won’t affect you, just remember that the gap between rich and poor is growing rapidly until one day soon there will be only the rich and the poor, and you will be the next target for elimination. The power elite want to reduce the world’s population down to 500 million–chances are, you’re not one of the them.
By Zen Gardner, http://www.zengardner.com
January 4, 2011
Why mince words when the planet’s being destroyed and we’re all being systematically murdered?When it finally dawns on you what these New World Order elite globalists are up to it can be staggering. And it can’t be more in your face than it is right now.
We have chemtrails continually ‘playing’ on the world’s biggest screen, our skies–horrific displays of absolute disregard for all things living. And yet the majority doesn’t even see them and there’s total silence about it from authorities and the media.
Flocks of birds are falling from the sky and millions of dead fish are washing up on our shores, and they all act dumb, like they have no idea what the hell is going on.
The Gulf of Mexico has been killed, the vital loop current disrupted, the weather shot to hell, the food and water are deliberately poisoned and altered, and then they screw with the stratosphere and magnetosphere with a host of devilish devices.
Never mind the deliberately trashed economy and the fabricated ‘war on terror’ while the police state clampdown continues.
And we’re not supposed to notice?..or think this is deliberate destruction of our world?
Enter the Two-man Wrecking Crew
And so they trot out a “friendly, respectable face” for this deliberate destruction and depopulation, hoping we won’t notice the havoc being wreaked in front of our eyes, all the while making us think they’re doing us a favor and ‘pioneering our future’.
..And with a message straight from the Bilderbergers which seems to say..
‘It’s time to step up the depopulation plan.’
So good, so clean, so ‘successful’, so giving……….Right.
Bill and Melinda Gates Tapped To Be ‘The Friendly Face of Eugenics”
- As F. William Engdahl in Financial Sense wrote:
- They feel comfortable with how well they’ve programmed and entranced most of society to accept such nonsense as global warming and carbon footprints, never mind the mythical ‘war on terror’ and a host of other lies.
- They’re signaling to their own the program’s ratcheting up.
Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy—population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.
Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!” Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing man-made CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares,
“First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
Hard to Believe?
Watch this short clip for yourself if you haven’t seen it yet, as he builds false premise upon false premise, like they all do as if we’re stone cold idiots, and then he gives his chilling solution on how to “Innovate to Zero”…
The Decade of Death
By the way, they’ve set a goal for their vaccine program they love so much. Is this a signal to their own?
Bill and Melinda Gates Pledge $10 Billion in Call for Decade of Vaccines
DAVOS, Switzerland — Bill and Melinda Gates announced today that their foundation will commit $10 billion over the next 10 years to help research, develop and deliver vaccines for the world’s poorest countries.
…said Melinda Gates,
“We’ve made vaccines our number-one priority at the Gates Foundation because we’ve seen firsthand their incredible impact on children’s lives.”
“Incredible impact”, alright.
And Not Just Vaccines, Folks…
Besides vaccines, the Gates are funding 10 different projects researching new contraception methods, including their latest that involves sterilizing men by putting ultrasound on their testes. (Nice one, Bill. Hope you’re trying it out nightly.)
But more importantly, the Gates of Hell also fund two other major thrusts towards the destruction of earth’s eco-system and the extermination of its inhabitants: geoengineering (chemtrails et al), and genetically modified organisms or GMOs.
‘Bill Gates’s Hidden Dreams of Geoengineering Revealed’
Bill Gates has already proven his interest in geoengineering schemes with his earlier co-patent filing for reducing the intensity of killer hurricanes. So perhaps we’re not too surprised that Science Insider has dug up the Microsoft chairman’s past projects on altering the Earth’s climate, ranging from filtering carbon dioxide to reflecting sunlight via brighter clouds. (Source)
‘Gates Foundation Funded Approval of Genetically Modified Mosquitos’
Bill Gates, who recently bought 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock, is reportedly funding the approval of genetically modified mosquitoes. It seems that not only will genetically modified salmon enter the environment along with unforeseen changes, but a new self-sterilizing mosquito may be joining them.
The plan, concocted by United Nations’ Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, involves creating genetically modified mosquitoes that either kill or sterilize themselves.The United Nations’ aim is to combat Dengue fever through the genetic manipulation of nature.
As with other genetically modified organisms, the long-term repercussions are widely unknown, and introducing a genetically modified creature into the environment may make for the genetic coding of an entire species to be altered.
The Monsanto Connection
Besides funding and profiting tax free from this horrific company, there’s an ‘image problem’ there too for which they’re trying to use Bilderbergers Bill and Melinda.
The immediate impact of these partnerships is to enhance the public image of Gene Giants that are donating royalty-free genes to needy farmers. But the longer-term goal is to create the “enabling environments” (biosafety regulations, intellectual property laws, positive media coverage to promote public acceptance) that will support the market introduction of genetically-engineered crops and related technologies. It’s a package deal — wrapped in a philanthropic façade — and it comes with strings attached…(Source)
Meet ‘Kill Bill’–enhancing the public image of death and depopulation
The Elite Call to Arms?
For those of you ‘awake and aware’ to what’s going on, that the world’s self-appointed ‘elite’ are planning a great ‘culling of the herd’ comes as no surprise. What’s remarkable is how blatant they’ve become about the subject.
This possibly denotes two things:
And the Bill and Melinda Gates (of Hell) Foundation is the new poster child and sanitizing ploy. But while every effort is being made to give the Gates Foundation a benign, philanthropic appearance, their primary program is clearly population reduction, just wrapped in brighter elitist “do gooder” package. “Awwwww. Look how they’re giving back and leading these new technologies…” Right…just wait and see.
But they’re throwing everything at it. And telling the others it’s time to throw in as well.
“A Time to Give, Brethren”
President Barack Obama met with Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chairman Warren Buffett and Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates this morning at the White House to discuss the economy and the billionaires’ philanthropic endeavors, an administration official said.
Obama called for the Oval Office meeting, which also included Gates’ wife, Melinda, to discuss the Giving Pledgeproject, started by Buffett and Gates to encourage wealthy U.S. individuals and families to give most of their fortunes to charity, the administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. (Source)
Why not. The old money will soon be worthless when we go through the ‘transition’ they have planned for us. “Use it for a good cause men. We’re gonna make the earth our own private country club!”
Still wondering? Why do you suppose they just locked up supplies of all the world’s natural seeds in an underground vault in Norway, but are busy altering the genetic make up of the seeds WE’RE supposed to eat?
Think about that.
Norway seed vault
And why are they feverishly burrowing their monstrous underground cites while trashing the environment on the surface of the earth? Oh, you don’t know about that? Or don’t believe it or “they woulda told us”? Please, pull your head out.
Are they preparing to board their underground ‘arks’?
Yeah, it’s ugly stuff to hear about. Would you rather just let the train run over you and I and others not say anything?
Sorry to say, this isn’t theory, it’s fact. Read up on “depopulation” and “eugenics” and you’ll find this has been their MO for centuries, periodically “culling the herd” with wars and epidemics, gutted economies and famines, all while keeping the world in one form of social slavery or another. It’s nothing new. It’s just that the expanding rate of humanity is accelerating at such a rate, our numbers frighten them and they want all those resources for themselves.
Have you noticed they tend to hoard slightly? The Rothschilds alone are worth an estimated 500 trillion dollars..with a ‘T’. The queen of England and the Vatican could bail out AND support half the world.
They’re not real big on sharing if you haven’t noticed, yet they make you feel guilty for devouring the earth’s resources.
Why believe anything they say?
This is how they view us. We’re now chillingly referred to as “human resources”. Spot your social ‘security’ number?
Bill Gates is one of many eugenicists, but he’s channeling gobs of money and a lot of perceived clout, and apparently they think he has the image to pull this off.
That global warming and the other scams still have such traction is hard to believe, but that’s the image the media is portraying. And people are swallowing it, I’m sorry to say, and will likely sit back and watch our demise and blame themselves for it. A neighbor mentioned the weird yesterday and added, “Do you think it’s God’s way of punishing us for what we’ve done to the planet?”
I know. Lunacy. It’s endemic.
The manipulated masses have been so dumbed down and indoctrinated, if the adulterated planet doesn’t kill them, they will practically volunteer for death to reduce their carbon footprint. That’s the cumulative effect and logical deduction you could arrive at. And it’s all by design.
It’s amazing to behold. People get all snotty about their energy saving Prius or recycling efforts, while joining hands and singing kumbaya with benign exterminator Bill and his conniving ilk over ‘the woes of global warming and human swarming’. Little do they know what their “final solution” really is.
This mass mind manipulation of guilt and lies is the drumbeat of the elites, while we swallow their planet destroying programs and march into the chemtrail sunset trying to eliminate our carbon footprints.
Only one way to do that…..
How manipulated are you?
Stay conscious. They’re spraying hard, closing down on our food supply, and more fabricated troubles are on their way.Keep your loved ones close and spread the word to the hungry.
Population Reference Bureau
July 28, 2010
Many countries are facing a shrinking pool of their working-age populations, often considered to be ages 15 to 64, to support the population ages 65+, jeopardizing pension guarantees and long-term health care programs for the elderly.
Worldwide in 1950, there were 12 persons of working age for every person age 65 or older. By 2010, that number had shrunk to 9. By 2050, this elderly support ratio, which indicates levels of potential social support available for the elderly, is projected to drop to 4.
The Population Reference Bureau’s 2010 World Population Data Sheet and its summary report offer detailed information on 19 population, health, and environment indicators for more than 200 countries.
“There are two major trends in world population today,” says Bill Butz, PRB’s president. “On the one hand, chronically low birth rates in developed countries are beginning to challenge the health and financial security of their elderly. On the other, the developing countries are adding over 80 million to the population every year and the poorest of those countries are adding 20 million, exacerbating poverty and threatening the environment.”
Global population rose to 6.9 billion in 2010, with nearly all of that growth in the world’s developing countries. In contrast, the world’s developed countries, totaling 1.2 billion people, saw their populations continue to age as the numbers of those of working age dwindle. For example, Japan has a total fertility rate of 1.4 children per woman, and an elderly support ratio of 3—the lowest in the world, along with Germany and Italy. By 2050, Japan will have only 1 working-age adult for every elderly person; Germany and Italy will each have 2.
“In 2011, world population will reach 7 billion, just 12 years after reaching 6 billion,” says Carl Haub, PRB’s senior demographer and author of this year’s data sheet. “It also took 12 years to climb from 5 billion to 6 billion. The big question now is when will we reach 8 billion? Most likely in 2024, 13 years after the seventh billion, but it could be sooner.”
The 2010 World Population Data Sheet shows the contrasts between developing and developed countries. Comparing Ethiopia and Germany illustrates how stark the contrasts can be (see table). Even though Ethiopia and Germany have almost the same population size today, Ethiopia is projected to more than double its population from 85 million today to 174 million in 2050. Germany’s population will likely decline from 82 million to 72 million over that same time. The cause of these enormous differences is lifetime births per woman. Ethiopia’s total fertility rate of 5.4 is four times greater than Germany’s rate of 1.3.
Key Demographic Indicators, 2010
|Population mid-2010||82 million||85 million|
|Population 2050 (projected)||72 million||174 million|
|Percent of population below age 15||14%||44%|
|Percent of population ages 65+||20%||3%|
|Elderly support ratio (2010)||3||17|
|Elderly support ratio (2050)||2||11|
|Lifetime births per woman||1.3||5.4|
|Annual births||650,000||3.3 million|
|Annual deaths||840,000||1 million|
|Life expectancy at birth||80 years||55 years|
|Infant mortality rate (per 1,000 live births)||3.5||77|
|Annual infant deaths||2,250||250,000|
Other Highlights From the 2010 World Population Data Sheet
- The worldwide recession appears to have caused declines in birth rates in some developed countries, such as Spain and the United States; and slowed down increases where birth rates had begun to rise, such as in Norway and Russia.
- Africa’s population is projected to double to 2 billion by 2050, although this growth could be greater if birth rates do not decrease faster than currently. Africa’s total fertility rate is 4.7 children per woman.
- Worldwide, 40 percent of the population, or more than 2.7 billion people, lack access to an adequate sanitation facility. The bulk of the underserved live in rural areas of developing countries. Only 40 percent of people in rural areas in these countries have access to sanitation.
- As the U.S. population ages, spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare will rise sharply. Total spending on these two programs is projected to increase from today’s level of 8.4 percent of GDP to 12.5 percent in 2030.
According to the CIA World Factbook, as of July 2005, there were approximately 6,446,131,400 people on the planet, and the death rate was approximately 8.78 deaths per 1,000 people a year. According to our nifty desktop calculator, that works out to roughly 56,597,034 people leaving us every year. Still, more people are being born than dying. The population growth rate is hovering around 1.14%, which doesn’t seem like much, but last year that was (back to the calculator!) 73,485,898 more mouths to feed. – How many people die each year worldwide?, Yahoo! Answers – November 28, 2005
July 28, 2010
According to the Population Reference Bureau’s “2010 World Population Data Sheet” (see story above), 4.45 people are born every second worldwide, on the average, and 1.8 people die every second.
Another way to look at it is:
- Per minute: 267 born, 108 die, (net population increase: 159)
- Per day: 384 thousand born, 156 thousand die, (net increase 229 thousand)
- Per year: 140.4 million born, 56.7 million die, (net increase 83.6 million)
Many nations are looking at a shrinking number of worker populations (ages 15-64), putting at risk pensions and long-term health programs.
In 2010, the world’s total population rose to 6.9 billion people. Almost 50% of the increase is in developing countries. Comparing two countries, such as Germany and Ethiopia highlights the issue. They both have approximately the same number of people today; however, Ethiopia is currently expected to see its 85 million grow to 174 million by 2050. Germany’s population is expected to shrink to 72 million (from about 82 million) over the same time frame. The reason for these big contrast is lifetime births per woman. Ethiopia’s fertility rate of 5.4 is 400% more than Germany’s 1.3.
Other interesting highlights of the report:
- The global economic recession seems to be causing reduced birth rates in some developed countries, such as the U.S. and Spain– and decelerated growths where birth rates had climbed (e.g. Russia, Norway).
- Africa’s population is on a path to doubling by the year 2050 to 2,000,000,000 people, although this number might even be higher, if birth rates do not decrease more quickly. Africa’s current fertility rate per woman is 4.7 children.
- Worldwide, 40% (2,700,000,000), do not have a suitable sanitation facility, most of whom reside in rural parts of developing nations.
The New York Times
July 29, 2010
With 267 people being born every minute and 108 dying, the world’s population will top seven billion next year, a research group projects, while the ratio of working-age adults to support the elderly in developed countries declines precipitously because of lower birthrates and longer life spans.
In a sobering assessment of those two trends, William P. Butz, president of the Population Reference Bureau, said that “chronically low birthrates in developed countries are beginning to challenge the health and financial security of the elderly” at the same time that “developing countries are adding over 80 million to the population each year and the poorest of those countries are adding 20 million, exacerbating poverty and threatening the environment.”
Projections, especially over decades, are vulnerable to changes in immigration, retirement ages, birthrates, health care and other variables, but in releasing the bureau’s 2010 population data sheet, Carl Haub, its senior demographer, estimated this week that by 2050 the planet will be home to more than nine billion people.
Even with a decline in birthrates in less developed countries from 6 children per woman in 1950 to 2.5 today (and to 2 children or less in Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Iran, Thailand and Turkey), the population of Africa is projected to at least double by midcentury to 2.1 billion. Asia will add an additional 1.3 billion.
While the United States, Australia, Canada and New Zealand will continue to grow because of higher birthrates and immigration, Europe, Japan and South Korea will shrink (although the recession reduced birthrates in the United States and Spain and slowed rising birthrates in Russia and Norway).
In Japan, the population of working-age people, typically defined as those 15 to 64, compared with the population 65 and older that is dependent on this younger group, is projected to decline to a ratio of one to one, from the current three to one. Worldwide, the ratio of working age people for every person in the older age group is expected to decline to four to one, from nine to one now.
Earlier this week, Eurostat, the statistical arm of the 27-nation European Union, reported that while the union’s population topped a half billion this year, 900,000 of the 1.4 million growth from the year before resulted from immigration. Eurostat has predicted that deaths will outpace births in five years, a trend that has already occurred in Bulgaria, Latvia and Hungary.
While the bulge in younger people, if they are educated, presents a potential “demographic dividend” for countries like Bangladesh and Brazil, the shrinking proportion of working-age people elsewhere may place a strain on governments and lead them to raise retirement ages and to encourage alternative job opportunities for older workers.
Even in the United States, the proportion of the gross domestic product spent on Social Security and Medicare is projected to rise to 14.5 percent in 2050, from 8.4 percent this year.
The Population Reference Bureau said that by 2050, Russia and Japan would be bumped from the 10 most populous countries by Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Strange Maps’ Frank Jacobs sets the stage:
What if the world were rearranged so that the inhabitants of the country with the largest population would move to the country with the largest area? And the second-largest population would migrate to the second-largest country, and so on?
Here’s the result: